So 9/11 was surely of a lot of relevance when it comes to the policies that the US government took afterwards, so it’s best we tackle it. To me out of all the different interpretations the no plane theory is the one that makes the most sense:

1. Planes tend to leave a “Wake Vortex” a vortex of spiraling wind behind them when in flight. While these usually lasts for like a minute or so, they are usually invisible to our sight, but they can be seen with smoke and fire. In the footage we saw of the 9/11 events, no Wake Vortex can be observed when the explosions take place.

2. In the footage of the 9/11 events, the planes seem to go inside the buildings without any kind of resistance. In a more realistic fashion, at the very least, pieces of the planes themselves should be seen blasted away from the building when they crash…

3. One of the live shots from the incident is that of the FOX Chopper 5 footage from Kai Simonsen. In it, the nose of the building can be seen completely penetrating one of the towers and the coming out intact through the other side of the tower while remaining at least mostly intact, which would have been impossible to the point of being ridiculous.

4. In the footage, Kai, also has a wideshot of both towers before zooming in. In the footage, the plane should have been visible already for at least 5 seconds but only really shows up after the full zoom.

5. Kai was skilled in green screen compositing, video compositing and AVID systems, exactly what’s needed to create the fake plane effect.

6. A blackout can be seen once the “nose” of the plane comes out of the building, this could have been Kai attempting to fix his mistake due to the helicopter being in motion.

7. The Blackout can’t be an automatic gain control nor a zoom in effect, despite Kai and the video compositing expert Steve Wright trying to explain away the effect in such a way.

8. The CNN, ABC Chopper 7 and FOX videos all cover the same event, and they all suffer from a similar, unexplainable blackout once the nose begins to show up.

9. Despite trying to explain away the event through it being some kind of solid object, there was revealed to be no actual “exit wound” in the building since despite the explosion the columns were still intact, so the videos later explained this away as the visible nose or structure now being smoke.

10. There is a CNN footage by Michael Hazerkhani, this has been known as the “Ghost Plane” footage, due to the plane somehow going inside the building with no realistic resistance or pushback.

11. Evan Fairbanks also had footage with similar effects, and in which the positions of the “engines” of the plane seem very unusual.

12. There’s a notable difference when it comes to the position and end of the “engines” of the plane in the footage of Hazerkhani and Fairbanks.

All of these points and more are covered in the documentary American Psy Opera by Ace Baker:

https://archive.org/details/thegreatamericanpsy-opera

This creates some conflict with the idea that the Jews are to blame for everything. If there were no planes then there were no hijackers, and I doubt that professional intelligence officers would allow themselves to be filmed dancing by common civilians. There’s some effort by the Jesuits to exaggerate the role of the Jews. But regardless, both groups took advantage of the events to push for wars in the Middle East. The CIA itself has made efforts to promote “The Dancing Israelis on 9/11” memes:

https://nypost.com/2017/09/23/valerie-plames-new-anti-semitic-game/

This is the actual Jesuit and CIA role in the 9/11 events:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1HWS0FwzTk