IMO after seeing the evidence presented against him I agree with the one rape charge he got and none of the others.
Clearly he forced the woman to do something she didn't want to do. She told multiple people the next day after it happened. They testified that she told them and she was crying while she did. Her parents took her to a rape clinic two days after the assault once she told them what had happened. Either this is the longest slow play ever or he did something he shouldn't have.
It's true they were fooling around before it happened but that does not give him permission to do what he did. If she said stop and he didn't that's rape.
As for the other charges, ridiculous. 20 years ago he garbed some woman's tits at a bar...really? I've garbed my fair share of asses at bars with women who were flirting with me. I guess technically I didn't ask before hand but clearly we we were all on the same page.
As for him putting his face in a woman's crotch, again context matters here. Was she playing around and flirting with him while he was drunk? Did she say don't do that again and he didn't? It was like 17 years ago... hard to imagine they found him guilty.
Apparently he was a bit theatrical in his hearing. That's why he got a relatively high sentence compared to the facts of his case vs what others have gotten. Remember that the UK has had rape gangs violently target very young children en masse in violent assaults and receive wrist slaps. Russel on the other hand never committed forcible rape.
But pantomiming being Jesus on the cross while being patted down, and bringing a large posse with you wearing liturgical clothing, and treating the whole thing as a space for teenage antics, probably not smart.
As we all know, there's no shortage of MUCH worse sexual crimes committed with MUCH more evidence being shrugged off by corrupt judges embracing "diversity".
Remember that the UK...
...cares more about Ukraine borders than their own.
being Jesus on the cross while being patted down...
These religious types don't realize how it only works on those who give a fuck. In local action events when folks start "as a Christian..." I gag. They can close with that, but it tarnishes ev.er.y.thing they say after.
It wouldn't surprise me if he did.
But based on words, not evidence.
You mean there were accusations, but no evidence to support them? Sounds like a frame-up.
IMO after seeing the evidence presented against him I agree with the one rape charge he got and none of the others.
Clearly he forced the woman to do something she didn't want to do. She told multiple people the next day after it happened. They testified that she told them and she was crying while she did. Her parents took her to a rape clinic two days after the assault once she told them what had happened. Either this is the longest slow play ever or he did something he shouldn't have.
It's true they were fooling around before it happened but that does not give him permission to do what he did. If she said stop and he didn't that's rape.
As for the other charges, ridiculous. 20 years ago he garbed some woman's tits at a bar...really? I've garbed my fair share of asses at bars with women who were flirting with me. I guess technically I didn't ask before hand but clearly we we were all on the same page.
As for him putting his face in a woman's crotch, again context matters here. Was she playing around and flirting with him while he was drunk? Did she say don't do that again and he didn't? It was like 17 years ago... hard to imagine they found him guilty.
But she was probably hot.
/s
RIP flirtation, no matter how you define it.
Bingo, I feel for the young. They've been so fucked up by crazy ideology.
Feeling for the young is what got Epstein in trouble.
Apparently he was a bit theatrical in his hearing. That's why he got a relatively high sentence compared to the facts of his case vs what others have gotten. Remember that the UK has had rape gangs violently target very young children en masse in violent assaults and receive wrist slaps. Russel on the other hand never committed forcible rape.
But pantomiming being Jesus on the cross while being patted down, and bringing a large posse with you wearing liturgical clothing, and treating the whole thing as a space for teenage antics, probably not smart.
That jives.
As we all know, there's no shortage of MUCH worse sexual crimes committed with MUCH more evidence being shrugged off by corrupt judges embracing "diversity".
...cares more about Ukraine borders than their own.
The irony is that this is all political theater.
These religious types don't realize how it only works on those who give a fuck. In local action events when folks start "as a Christian..." I gag. They can close with that, but it tarnishes ev.er.y.thing they say after.
As a conspirophile, this is what I think.